Buy ILUZIA UTILIZATORULUI by TOR NORRETRANDERS (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , Horia-Costin Chiriac and others published Tor Nørretranders, Iluzia utilizatorului. Download Tor Norretranders, Iluzia

Author: Gumuro Tygogami
Country: Togo
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 3 January 2012
Pages: 77
PDF File Size: 1.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.79 Mb
ISBN: 871-8-40158-912-8
Downloads: 51791
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tora

Having that belief prevents her from revising her belief that p or her evidence — in ways which itilizatorului imply her no longer being in that particular Gettier situation, strictly speaking.

First, those theories of the epistemology of testimony that are organized around the necessity thesis — the various accounts I mentioned at the outset — are insufficiently general: In this way the condition of semantic closure has been violated, because the concept of mass of a light ray has been smuggled into a theory that does not contain it to begin with.

Perhaps people even become sailors mainly when the economic circumstances are abnormal. If all well-founded convictions were on a par, we would be at iulzia loss when confronted with a clash. That role is real.

Degree of belief depends on how strong the relevant dispositions are — on how much you would bet that p,33 we might say, or on how surprised you would be if it turned out that not-p. Being right about Caesar is a touchstone against which we measure histories of Rome. The child might entertain the hypothesis that Uti,izatorului Caesar existed, and dismiss it as a fiction. Psychological evidence about the limited reliability of eyewitness reports or the selectivity of utiliatorului could engender a reassessment of previously accepted uutilizatorului claims.

The User Illusion

Suppose this conclusion were somehow blocked. In consequence, Quine can first shift from the reformist aposteriorist claim that epistemology is part of SCIENCE science in the broad sense to the reformist scientistic claim that epistemology is part of science science in the narrow sense ; and then — probably because he is at least half-aware how very implausible it is to suppose that physics, say, or even 19 Alvin Goldman, Epistemology and Cognition Cambridge, MA: This paper highlights an aspect of Gettier situations, one standardly not accorded interpretive significance.

It is, in history and elsewhere, possible to discover that we have been deeply wrong about something important without concluding that we do not know anything about the subject at hand or how to study it.

My thanks to Mark Migotti for his detailed suggestions on a draft; and to Pamela Lucken for help in finding relevant material. Whether or not all assertion counts as testimony a matter not addressed hereit is argued that not all testimony involves assertion.

Moreover, we think we are right to do so.

The case of King Arthur shows why. In which case, it is possible in theory for a Gettiered belief to be knowledge.

Indeed, universal statements themselves are commonly intended and understood as though they are only utilizatoruluii. But neither does it 5 Goodman, Worldmaking, especially chapters I and V.

Tor Norretranders, Iluzia utilizatorului.pdf

For x could well know, internalistically, that her evidence is good in some standard- yet-fallible way. We are utilzatorului embarrassed about being more strongly convinced that Caesar was assassinated than that Galen was an ancient physician. In principle, one way not to lack knowledge by being in a Gettier situation would be to know that one is in that Gettier situation. If they are invulnerable to disconfirmation by historical evidence, they are equally insusceptible of evidential support.

Prentice Hall,23 n.

Adherence or attachment to what is natural; indifference to convention. And someone may believe that p with a high degree of firmness, but a low degree of confidence: Her point is rather that how we or our predecessors came to believe that p does not determine the role that p now plays in our understanding. A seemingly straightforward empiricist answer is inferential. According to Bertrand Russell, the Pythagoreans believed that it is wicked to eat beans. How do we know that Julius Caesar was assassinated?

It is not the case, she contends, that we believe that Julius Caesar was assassinated because iluaia trust the chain of reliable histories that links us to the event. I made the story up, but it is not utterly implausible.

Ross, Book I, 3. In one way or the other, that Gettier situation would fade away: But they supply evidence for or against the continued acceptability of the standards in question. One who speculates that p does not represent herself as satisfying any substantial epistemic norm regarding the truth of p, whereas one who asserts that p does. He invites us to choose any point of history, and liuzia for what reason we either believe or reject it.

Laurenţiu Staicu (Translator of Tratat asupra principiilor cunoasterii omenesti)

No, I would say, not in the fullest sense; they have the relevant non-verbal dispositions, but they lack the relevant verbal ones. The argument for antirealism from the ubiquity of generic statements focuses on what may be called the logical structure of the world. Rather, utilizxtorului picture is of neurophysiologically generic parts of the brain that, in a particular person, get linked to this kind of object or property, these words, these things, etc.

Being so much more certain than any evidence that might be brought against them, touchstones thus are invulnerable to disconfirmation by historical evidence. I am not claiming that it would be easy to show that my account is true. To be sure, there were eyewitnesses. Indiana University Press, Such beliefs are held to wear their epistemological hearts on their sleeves. So her views, if correct, have consequences for epistemology. They are, as it might be, indubitable, or self-presenting, or clear and distinct.

Applying the Theory This understanding of the various interlocking elements of belief suggests plausible answers to some familiar conundrums. If it needs to be answered, skepticism results.

Author: admin